Home / All Products

This book is a French Calvinist's defense for the Reformed practice of infant baptism. I think that most "truly Reformed" men in our day would say that Marcel's treatment is a fair representation of Calvinism's position on the doctrine? (Were this not the case, I doubt that the late Dr. Philip Edgumbe Hughes of Westminster Theological Seminary (Philadelphia) would have given so much of his time to do the work of translating it.)

The Case for Christianity is part of C.S. Lewis’ World War II “Broadcast Talks” and is one of the first of the three books that now comprise Mere Christianity. The other two books of Mere Christianity are Christian Behaviour and Beyond Personality: Beginning Steps in the Doctrine of the Trinity.

Zillions of English-speaking Christians owe their eternal lives to two books: Holy Scripture and C.S. Lewis’ The Case for Christianity.

Did the apostles and the earliest church, when called for, cognitively defend the Gospel as true or no?

This is for those Christians who accuse you of being an "intellectual pointy-head" when you argue that some non-Christians need to converse with us regarding the truthfulness (or lack thereof?) of the Gospel claims.

Originally an Inter-Varsity monograph in small booklet form, The Evidence for the Resurrection tackles basic arguments against Jesus’ resurrection from the dead, offers a Christian response to these, and a positive defense of Jesus’ resurrection having actually occurred.

Anderson was a missionary to Muslim lands and later became a professor of law, particularly of Islamic law. It is short, but argued as a lawyer would argue the case.

See also Dr. Anderson’s Jesus Christ: The Witness of History.

A study in the 17th-century Lutheran dogmaticians, with whose writings (in Latin!) the late, great Confessional Lutheran professor/pedagogue was more familiar than any other man of his century.

A tour de force on the subject of the inspiration of the Bible, complete with detailed use of the key verses.

The classic work by the contemporary of Luther, compiler of the Book of Concord and author of the massive Examination of the Council of Trent.

Careful analysis of key passages and with the respect that a lawyer would employ in exegeting someone's "last will and testament" - an image that Chemnitz uses regularly for these last words of the Lord Jesus.

This little Inter-Varsity classic has been republished more times than a person can count—and for good reason. Clear, readable, definitive and written for the interested layman (and his friends!) Absolutely the opposite of "for specialists only."

The back of an old copy has the following text: "Fact or fabrication? Christianity is founded upon historical events. If the claims and life of Jesus Christ are mere fabrications, Christianity collapses. Since the New Testament is the primary historical source, its reliability is a crucial issue in any discerning evaluation of Christianity. This book presents in readable form the results of modern research and sound historical scholarship."

From the 1950s, pre-Vatican II. This book lays out the basic argument as to why you should convert to Romanism. It will have you pulling out your Visa card to buy your airline ticket to Rome.

This is not so much a polemic against "Protestants" as it is a positive description (by a very intelligent adherent) of the historic Roman Catholic theology. The book is a good resource for the searching layman, but of profit for clergy, too.

"The classic statement of orthodox Lutheran Christology. Demonstrates how the Christology of the Reformation agrees with Scripture, the ancient creeds, and the church fathers... Dr. Preus provides notes at the end of each chapter, indicating the location of quotations in available and modern editions." (publisher's catalog description)

A masterpiece by the great contemporary of Luther. This work has been called "the second greatest work on the person of Christ to come out of the Western church" (second, of course, to Athanasius' On The Incarnation of the Word). A paradigm combination of Reformation exegesis and theological prose.

As a theological student in Finland, Dr. Saarnivaara became interested in the question of Scriptural baptism. Which baptism, he wondered, had the most authority: the one a person received in infancy, or the one received as an adult after a conscious conversion. Should he, as one who had been baptized in infancy, be baptized again, after his conversion, in order to be a Christian in the Biblical sense, or was the baptism he received as a child valid?